<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform May 2002
Thursday, May 23, 2002, 2:53:29 PM, James Love wrote:
> This is good news. The GA can actually do things that allow people to
> register their views, and one imagines this will make it difficult for the
> ICANN BOD to claim consensus for the Lynn proposal or its close substitutes.
No, all it has succeeded in doing is giving the BoD all the ammunition
it needs to completely disregard and ignore the GA.
Shame on you for abusing the GA in this fashion, and shame on the
Chair for acknowledging privately that the motion was in fact out of
scope of the GA, but not doing his job and putting a stop to this
stupidity.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|