Re: [ga] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform May 2002

["James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>]

William, thanks for your gracious message.  I can see why the ICANN BoD or
staff doesn't like elections.   People aren't happy with the BoD or staff.
Is this important to know?   I think so.  Jamie

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X Walsh" <william@wxsoft.info>
To: "James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform May 2002


: Thursday, May 23, 2002, 2:53:29 PM, James Love wrote:
:
: > This is good news.  The GA can actually do things that allow people to
: > register their views, and one imagines this will make it difficult for
the
: > ICANN BOD to claim consensus for the Lynn proposal or its close
substitutes.
:
: No, all it has succeeded in doing is giving the BoD all the ammunition
: it needs to completely disregard and ignore the GA.
:
: Shame on you for abusing the GA in this fashion, and shame on the
: Chair for acknowledging privately that the motion was in fact out of
: scope of the GA, but not doing his job and putting a stop to this
: stupidity.
:
: --
: Best regards,
: William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
: --
: Save Internet Radio!
: CARP will kill Webcasting!
: http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
:
:
:


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html