Re: [ga] Request for a Clarifying Vote

[Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca>]

James Love wrote:

> ... But with the next ICANN board meeting a
> few weeks away, and almost zero bottom up statement
> on the fundamental issue of how the board is going
> to be elected, it would seem to me to be much more
> important to focus now on the issue of board
> selection.

I agree.

My opinion is that ICANN should live up to the
commitments made at its founding and find a way
to have open elections for half the board.

I'll certainly grant that this isn't easy, but
nothing I've seen to date convinces me it is
impossible. 

Not have I seen any proposal for an alternative
that appears likely to deliver adequate representation
for the public interest.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html