Re: [ga] Request for a Clarifying Vote

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Funny thing about people or groups that do not live up to promises.

They are basically rat dogs and scum bags.  And when they do it
repeatedly and hurt honest people in the process, then they are double
rat dogs and scum bags.  Golly gee willakers I wish I could put it
nicer.
Ah shucks I guess I will get over it.  but I tend to want to hurt rat
dogs and scum bags.
There is a group of people that are intentionally and consistently
hurting people that I like and that are not hurting others for their own
sake.
What is an Internet terrorist if it is not the ICANN Staff?

Eric

Sandy Harris wrote:

> James Love wrote:
>
> > ... But with the next ICANN board meeting a
> > few weeks away, and almost zero bottom up statement
> > on the fundamental issue of how the board is going
> > to be elected, it would seem to me to be much more
> > important to focus now on the issue of board
> > selection.
>
> I agree.
>
> My opinion is that ICANN should live up to the
> commitments made at its founding and find a way
> to have open elections for half the board.
>
> I'll certainly grant that this isn't easy, but
> nothing I've seen to date convinces me it is
> impossible.
>
> Not have I seen any proposal for an alternative
> that appears likely to deliver adequate representation
> for the public interest.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html