<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Request for a Clarifying Vote
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
: >We should probably have a GA vote on different possible consensus
: >positions on the issue of elections.
:
: New and intelligent arguments may have more impact than another vote
: from the very GA which just asked for a re-bid.
:
Even old intelligent arguments are important. Evidence of what is the
consensus is important, regardless of the novelty of the position. Noise
on the GA list is interesting, I guess, but results of these votes can be
much more important. If there is a large supermajority view on the issue
of how the board is elected, that would be significant, in Bucharest.
Jamie
PS.... Motion 2 also addressed the issue of a rebid, as you know.
--------------------------------
James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|