ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] How to disenfranchise 489 members of the DNSO


Names Council Recommendation 23 - General Assembly . The gTLD policy 
development body should have a general assembly whose prime role is to 
provide a forum for broad inter-constituency exchange. Consequently, 
membership should be limited to the agreed stakeholders who are represented 
in the policy development body.

This recommendation has been approved by every constituency in the DNSO.  

There are no more than 100 members of the GA voting roster that have 
identified themselves as "agreed stakeholders".  The rest of us that don't 
belong to established constituencies (489) have been told to take a hike by 
the elitists on the Council.  

This type of fuck-you attitude is precisely what is wrong with both the DNSO 
and ICANN. 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>