<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] WLS
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, at 14:20 [=GMT-0700], Mason Cole wrote:
> Here's a brief set of corrections to be sure everyone has the dispassionate
> facts:
>
> The distinction is not speculators versus "normal" consumers; as many have
> correctly pointed out, this distinction doesn't get you very far. Rather,
> the problem we're addressing is service of a *few* customers -- whoever they
> may be -- and exclusion of the majority of customers. Speculators are among
> our best customers; we have no desire to see them disadvantaged. What we do
> want to see is the system being more transparent to unsophisticated users,
> one in which evidence of use by *all types* of customers is readily
> available.
>
> There is no evidence that any non-speculator customer -- IP owner,
> corporation, etc. -- uses any of the "competing" services referred to.
> Whether they are capable of being found or not (mostly not, and when found,
> confusing and sometimes very expensive), there is no question that consumers
> are simply not finding them. There is no evidence to the contrary, though it
> has been requested for months.
Well, how will they find WLS then?
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [ga] WLS
- From: "John Berryhill" <john@johnberryhill.com>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|