ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Business Constituency


George Kirikos wrote: 

> Lots of potential problems, though...e.g. which domains to include
> (e.g. is a .com domain equal to a .de domain?)? How about .tv domains?
> (e.g. someone at Verisign could create a billion fake domains, to get
> lots of voting power). Maybe restrict it to the gTLD domains, until
> such time as ICANN is charging a fixed fee per domain across all TLDs?
> (e.g. once .ca holders get charged 25 cents in ICANN fees per year, or
> whatever .com holders will be charged, .ca holders would be eligible to

> have their domains count in the voting)

Why should name holders in a ccTLD pay a TAX to ICANN for ICANN to use it
for non ccTLD issues. The ccTLD's run their own policy and do it by whatever
system they wish. .au has a $11 AUD fee from registry to auDA. .nz has about
a $3 NZD policy 'cost'. 

If, and thats a big if, ICANN actually DID something to update the IANA
records and in fact stopped all the BS around ICP-1 THEN people might talk
about what policy areas _might_ be international and then determine how to
approach them.

A very quick read of the changes to the MOU appears to make ICANN even more
rabid over what it thinks its controls of the ccTLD's will be.

Steven Heath
.nz news & views
http://radio.weblogs.com/0110729/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>