<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Generics [Was RE: [ga] Interesting WIPO ruling re:NewZealand.biz]
- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: RE: Generics [Was RE: [ga] Interesting WIPO ruling re:NewZealand.biz]
- From: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:37:32 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <003f01c2714a$7cb48880$500546aa@banxico.org.mx>
- References: <003f01c2714a$7cb48880$500546aa@banxico.org.mx>
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
At 12:20 PM -0500 10/11/02, Rodrigo Orenday Serrato wrote:
>The case you mention concerns the use of force (in spite of which there
>would be little concern for license plates and taxes) in international
>public law and is a totally unrelated subject.
>
>Stick to the point.
OK. How about you answer some of the questions I put to you in previous
postings?
Do you advocate voiding the registration of mercadolibre.com.mx because
it's a generic term?
--
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|