<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Generics [Was RE: [ga] Interesting WIPO ruling re: NewZealand.biz]
Perhaps; it's not only generic, but also descriptive of their services.
However it may be considered to be sufficently distinctive as a service mark
by some instances.
Atentamente, Regards
Rodrigo Orenday Serratos
-----Mensaje original-----
De: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]En nombre de Andy
Gardner
Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Octubre de 2002 12:38 PM
Para: ga@dnso.org
Asunto: RE: Generics [Was RE: [ga] Interesting WIPO ruling re:
NewZealand.biz]
At 12:20 PM -0500 10/11/02, Rodrigo Orenday Serrato wrote:
>The case you mention concerns the use of force (in spite of which there
>would be little concern for license plates and taxes) in international
>public law and is a totally unrelated subject.
>
>Stick to the point.
OK. How about you answer some of the questions I put to you in previous
postings?
Do you advocate voiding the registration of mercadolibre.com.mx because
it's a generic term?
--
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|