Re: Re[3]: [ga-ext]The IC constituency building results so far [was: stuff]

["NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

On this we agree. It is simpler and more viable to ask them to accept an IC
or an IDNHC first with some suggestion as to how it will be formed or how
existing orgs can apply for this.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>
To: <ga-ext@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:30 PM
Subject: RE: Re[3]: [ga-ext]The IC constituency building results so far
[was: stuff]


> Without getting into the personalities involved I see any motion supported
> by the GA as being on if it is seen that an Individuals Constituency
should
> be encouraged by the ICANN Board.  I oppose having the IDNO associated
with
> any such motion on the grounds the IDNO brings too many bad associations
> into the minds of a number of people who the GA may wish to impress with
> the importance of having an Individuals Constituency.  As to the validity
> of such bad associations with the IDNO, I do not intend to make any
> judgements.  The fact they are present is enough to discount the IDNO as
> being viable for inclusion in any push by the GA made on the ICANN Board
or
> the DNSO.
>
> It may be the GA will wish to present the IDNO as a possible contender for
> an Individual Constituency or the GA may wish to recognise another
> association.
>
> To me the two issues are distinct however and they should not be jumbled
> together.
>
> 1. Does the GA wish the DNSO and the ICANN Board to recognise the value in
> having an Individual Constituency?
>
> 2. Does the GA wish to present any existing association for the role of an
> Individual Constituency?
>
> 3. Does an association wishing to be an Individual Constituency gain
> promotional support from the GA or should they be left to present their
own
> case to the DNSO and ICANN Board?
>
> As I see it, those are the three current issues with repect to this topic.
> They are all distinct and should not be lumped together IMHO.
>
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-ext@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-ext" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-ext@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-ext" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html