Re: [ga-ext]The IC constituency building results so far [was: stuff]

["NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Kent, I'm still waiting to see anything you would support in favor of an
IDNH Constituency. Do you? From what I have read on these lists you don't
seem to be infavor of one at all. So not being in favor of a particular one
in your case seems irrelevant. Are you misunderstood? Do you support an IDNH
Constituency at all?


Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Crispin" <kent@songbird.com>
To: <ga-ext@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [ga-ext]The IC constituency building results so far [was:
stuff]


> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:12:45PM +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > You are the driving motor of this trio of dissidents
>
> There are many more people than the "trio of dissidents" who feel that
> your IDNO can not possible serve as an individual's constituency of the
> DNSO, however defined.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
> kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-ext@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-ext" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-ext@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-ext" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html