Re: A point of agreement (Re: [ga-roots] response to responsetoresponse)

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Nope you would be wrong on that one, think about the early court system of England,
crossing the well and the gavel.  The board was the bar, which came to be the bench,
which we can ask to approach, within the public house, which became the court house.

This should be under rules. No on second thoughts it is appropriate under roots because
it has to do with the roots of our language, like names.  Wow it just hit me, Why do
they call them ROOT SERVERS? come on this deserves an answer from one of you who were
around when the named them.  (I could have just gone to netsol domain policy list and
looked it up, but that is gone)

"William S. Lovell" wrote:

> Which term? "unfettered arrogance" or "across the board?" I think
> you mean the latter, and , yes, there could have been a B instead
> of a b.  :-)
>
> (So far as I know, the actual term "across the board" comes from
> some board game, where one player is wiping out the others, e.g.,
> he's got both Boardwalk and Park Place, just bought the railroads,
> etc.)
>
> Monopoly, anyone?
>
> Bill Lovell
>
> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Great use of the term accross the board, where does that term come form?  Does it
> > relate to the ICANN bored of Dierekters?
> >
> > "William S. Lovell" wrote:
> >
> > > You're exactly right, Joop!  :-)
> > > The Rockefellers and others too numerous to mention
> > > made billions here in the U.S. on the backs of us peasants,
> > > from which arose some of those laws, and the evolution
> > > of the internet is going the same way; the little guy
> > > is toast.
> > >
> > > (Not all ills arise that way, of course -- cookies and other
> > > things like that don't need a monopoly, but only a certain
> > > level of unfettered arrogance adopted across the board.)
> > >
> > > Bill Lovell
> > >
> > > Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > >
> > > > At 06:42 31/05/01 -0700, William S. Lovell wrote:
> > > > >Economic Darwinism, the bane of any society that claims to
> > > > >be civilized, the loss of any moral core, and the seed of that
> > > > >society's destruction.
> > > >
> > > >   I guess Economic Darwinists also disapprove of anti-trust legislation...,
> > > > the SEC....
> > > >
> > > > --Joop--
> > > > Founder of the Cyberspace Association.
> > > > Former bootstrap of the IDNO (www.idno.org)
> > > > Developer of    The Polling Booth
> > > > www.democracy.org.nz
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html