<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga-roots] Re: ICANN Policy -- revised version
On 2001-06-20 13:32:51 -0700, M. Stuart Lynn wrote:
>What it in effect said is that it would be erroneous for any
>alternate (pseudo or otherwise) root operator to *assume* that
>ICANN would necessarily avoid doing so. What the draft effectively
>says is that ICANN's orderly decision process (always, of course,
>subject to improvement) operating within its public trust would
>not be preempted by actions taken by others operating outside of
>the public trust. That is, do not assume that by creating a TLD
>within an alternate root, you receive credit with ICANN's own
>processes and can thereby tie ICANN's hands.
>To put it another way. ICANN has no policy asserting that it will
>give credit to any TLD created outside of ICANN's processes. Which
>means precisely that ICANN can give no credit to any TLD created
>outside of ICANN's processes. Which is what I wrote.
Thanks for putting this so clearly. There is hardly any objection
one could make against this.
It would be great if your draft would be as clear (and short ;-) as
the two paragraphs quoted above.
"I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time
to make it shorter." -- Blaise Pascal
--
Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|