Re: [ga-roots] Re: ICANN Policy -- revised version

["Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@prodigy.net>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "M. Stuart Lynn" <lynn@icann.org>
> 
> *****We now have interesting situations where, quite independently of 
> ICANN, there is conflict between most of new.net's names and names in 
> other alternate roots. This is the expected result of a regime where 
> root-zone decisions are made in an uncoordinated fashion by companies 
> based on their individual commercial concerns. Given the incentive 
> for a better-financed commercial actor to muscle aside a weaker one, 
> the result of this lack of coordination is name conflicts that 
> certainly does not make for a stable DNS.
> 

Are you saying the IPv4 DNS is "unstable" at this point in time ?

Is stability gained from pre-registrations, lotteries, raffles, and
registrations that focus on collisions totally outside of the entry
of SLD.TLD nameservers into TLD nameservers.

Have you concluded (before proof-of-concept) that Dual TLD Clusters
are unstable ?

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12215.html
"Proof of Concept TLD Development...and Multiple TLD Clusters"


Have any of the TLDs ICANN has "approved" deployed any
IPv4 nameservers ?

Have any of the TLDs ICANN has "approved" deployed any
native IPv6 nameservers ?


Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html