Re: [ga-rules] Proposal for a Buddy Sytem for new members

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

This is bothersome in another way.  What do they have to be proficient at?  If I
am here because of my participation in WG which help write legal documents and
review contracts with third parties am I to be banned because I do not have a
engineering degree. I like the reverse quite well.  Ban all engineers without
formal policy writing education.

The point is that blocking any participation in the General Assembly hurts its'
bottoms-up mission.

Sincerely,

Jeff Williams wrote:

> WXW and all,
>
> William X. Walsh wrote:
>
> > Friday, June 22, 2001, 7:50:14 AM, Jeff Williams wrote:
> > >   The GA is a "General Assembly", as such it is open, or should be open to
> > > any and all interested Parties as is outlined in the White Paper and MoU
> > > for interaction, debate, and discourse on the various forums that the DNSO
> > > GA no has.
> >
> > It is open.  The only things it is not open to are multiple
> > subscriptions by the same person under multiple pseudonyms, and it is
> > not open to those who cannot comport themselves in a civil fashion.
>
>   Hummmm?  I guess than Roberto should be banned for having several
> E-Mail address's subscribed?
>
>   Can you defing or is there a Participant determined definition of
> "Civil Fashion"?  If so, where might that definition be documented?
> Where is the voting record of that decision on that definition?
> You see, there are many acceptable definitions of what is "Civil"
> or "Civil fashion" in this instance, that could apply....  What is the
> DNSO GA's definition, is it well understood, is it documented,
> is it a participant determined policy?
>
> >
> >
> > That said, a participant in this GA SHOULD be well grounded in
> > DNS/domain name issues.  Otherwise, there is no purpose to their
> > participation, and they really have nothing substantive to contribute.
>
>  I agree, but how is this determined?  Who, and under what criterion
> is this determined?
>
>   I have noticed a number of participants that in my opinion don't
> have a clue as to how the DNS works or was designed, nor understand
> what is and "Issue" or is not.  Some of these Participants have been
> participating for quite some time now.
>
>   Given this, are you now proposing that they can no longer participate,
> or even suggesting such a thing?
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> > Userfriendly.com Domains
> > The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> > DNS Services from $1.65/mo
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html