[ga-rules] Discussing the Meaning of "Consensus"

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:33:34 -0700, Eric Dierker wrote:

> We must do both; argue and delve and debate and question and postulate and
> formulate:  But then we must also conglomerate and educate and reformulate
> and provide proof and *DIRECT* policy.

Hi Eric

The consensus seems to be that "consensus" should be discussed on
{ga-rules].  One or two don't agree.  The others don't care very much.

As Acting Chair, my determination is that [ga-rules] is the appropriate
venue to discuss "meta" issues relating to rules, procedures, protocols
and how to reach consensus.

Wouldn't you agree?

Best regards
Patrick Corliss



--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html