Re: [ga-rules] Discussing the Meaning of "Consensus"

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Here we go again.



Monday, June 25, 2001, 7:32:46 AM, Patrick Corliss wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:33:34 -0700, Eric Dierker wrote:

>> We must do both; argue and delve and debate and question and postulate and
>> formulate:  But then we must also conglomerate and educate and reformulate
>> and provide proof and *DIRECT* policy.

> Hi Eric

> The consensus seems to be that "consensus" should be discussed on
> {ga-rules].  One or two don't agree.  The others don't care very much.

> As Acting Chair, my determination is that [ga-rules] is the appropriate
> venue to discuss "meta" issues relating to rules, procedures, protocols
> and how to reach consensus.

> Wouldn't you agree?

> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss



> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html