[ga-udrp] ga-udrp various

["Rothnie, Warwick" <Warwick.Rothnie@msj.com.au>]

Mallesons Stephen Jaques
Confidential communication

Jeff Williams wrote:




->
>
> >The Complainant can Forum Shop. There is NO appeals process. There is
no
>> committee to oversee the actions of the arbitrators. 84% Victory rate
for
> >Complainants overall. Using NO use of a domain name as Bad Faith and
finding
> >that a TM was infringed upon. With NO commercial use. Give me a break
here.
>
>> Spin on my good man.

 >I have had a series of private exchanges with Warwick very recently.
>He does seem to have a certain interest in "Spinning".  But that's just
>fine, it is usually easily noticed...

I see, if one does not agree with your views, one is necessarily
"spinning" as you guys are motivated solely by altruism and reason?

As to the private exchanges: Unknown to me, the listmaster was rejecting
my posts as something was being interpolated into my e-mail address at
this end here.  The problem has now been fixed and so the posts are
going through.
I think I was proposing three questions:

1  Should a registrar be able to charge the complainant a fee for
implementing a Dispute Resolution Panel's determination to transfer or
cancel a domain name?

2  Are you a registrar or an officer, employee or agent of a registrar?

3  Have you been an unsuccessful respondent to a UDRP complaint?

Although I believe Jeff and I may have thought that the third question
should be : "Are you a registrant, or an officer, agent or legal
representative of a registrant, of a domain name which a UDRP panel has
ordered transferred or cancelled?

Not sure if you wished to pursue your fourth possible question, Jeff?

Warwick A Rothnie
Partner
Mallesons Stephen Jaques Melbourne
Direct line (61 3) 9643 4254
Fax (61 3) 9643 5999
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-udrp@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-udrp" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html