Re: [ga-udrp] barcelona and more ducks

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 16:48 4/07/01 +1000, Rothnie, Warwick wrote:
>Mallesons Stephen Jaques
>Confidential communication
>
>Jeff Williams said:
>
> >Well how about just one duck for the purposes of this post,
> >Barcelona.com?  >;)
>
>OK, so let's assume barcelone.com is wrong, but one case out of 3,000
>plus doesn't suggest (let alone prove) a completely flawed system even
>less so now that the system has produced the rulings in brisbanecity.com
>and brisbane.com.  On this basis, the system seems to be working, not in
>complete disarray.

No , it is not in complete disarray, but it does produce injustice without 
much possibility of redress.
A judicial system is not supposed to.

The loss of a working Domain Name is as irreversible as an execution.
Justice must be part of the expectations, not just an occasional 'bonus" to 
prove that the system "works".
In order to achieve that, the flaws need to be corrected.


Joop Teernstra LL.M.,
councillor
InternetNZ

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-udrp@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-udrp" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html