[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Since nobody in authority wants to announce it...
- To: bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich)
- Subject: Re: [ga] Since nobody in authority wants to announce it...
- From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:14:19 -0500
- Cc: ga@dnso.org
- In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19991027081830.03a2d320@mail.nic.nu>
- References: <4.2.0.58.19991026213624.00be5950@shell2.bayarea.net><19991027131038.Y11257@cosmos.kaist.ac.kr><199910270219.TAA27067@agamemnon.home.com><199910270219.TAA27067@agamemnon.home.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
At 10:18 AM 10/27/1999 , J. William Semich wrote:
>If you use a thermometer to test whether you are sick, and the thermometer
>says you have a high fever, it is merely "denial" to question the numbering
>scale on the thermometer. Instead, it is time to try and cure the sickness.
>
>Kilnam's post is a reference to the numbers on the thermometer - those
>numbers indicate the process is not well.
Bill,
Perhaps this seems like old news, by now, but I was reviewing this thread
and remain dismayed at the dangers it carries.
To carry the example forward:
1. All thermometers are not accurate.
2. A person's NORMAL temperature varies over the course of the day.
3. Different people have different normal temperatures.
4. Have you tried taking your temperature immediately after coming out of
a whirlpool spa?
The point, therefore, is to be very careful when claiming that an
"objective" measure shows that you are sick.
Specifically:
There is a difference between real equality (and real representation,
and...) versus mechanical conformance to a numbers game. If we insist on
the latter, history suggests we will not really get the former.
d/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker 675 Spruce Drive Tel: +1.408.246.8253
Brandenburg Consulting Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA Fax: +1.408.273.6464
<mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com> <http://www.brandenburg.com>