[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ga] A question for my friend





Dave Crocker wrote:



> ...be very careful when claiming that an "objective" measure shows that you
> are sick.

I agree, especially with examples chosen to illustrate a point!

> There is a difference between real equality (and real representation,
> and...) versus mechanical conformance to a numbers game.  If we insist on
> the latter, history suggests we will not really get the former.

Are you suggesting that all substantive issues require consensus of the
community to be "enacted" (rather than a majority or supermajority vote)?