Re: [ga] nomination procedures

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

I believe you are wrong, but forgiveness isn't necessary. I find it 
perfectly logical that the GA provides one candidate that the NC
can choose to accept or decline. The choice will be, in a word,
telling.

I find it insulting that the small NC gets the final choice. That
should remain the choice of the GA.

--
Christopher Ambler
Personal Opinion Only, of course
This address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington
who does not wish to receive any unsolicited commercial email
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Javier Rodriguez" <jrl@mail.lima.net.pe>
To: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] nomination procedures


> Dear Christopher and all:
> 
> The bylaws says that the NC has to CHOOSE... how they can CHOOSE
> if you give just one candidate as the ONLY option ?  did you see the
> point ? WE must provide a number greater than one... so in that way
> there is no possibilty that nobody can say that we dont follow the
> ICANN Bylaws...got it ? and, at the same time, we guarantee ourselves
> that we will get ONE of the FEW pre-choosen candidates that we
> will choose in a democratic, open and transparent way.
> 
> If I am wrong, I ask your forgiveness.
> 
> Yours truly,
> 
> Javier
> 
> At 11/15/99 10:43:00 AM, you wrote:
> >There is a motion on the floor, which has been seconded, that the
> >GA nominate one and only one candidate. I believe that your
> >remarks are out of order.
> >
> >No further discussion appearing, I call the question.
> >
> >Christopher
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Javier Rodriguez                     jrl@mail.lima.net.pe
> AXISNET                                    VicePresident
> Peruvian Association of Internet Users and ISPs
> Other duties: ECOMLAC      ISOC -PERU      IPCE
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>