New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

>
>The bylaws says that the NC has to CHOOSE... how they can CHOOSE
>if you give just one candidate as the ONLY option ?  did you see the
>point ? WE must provide a number greater than one... so in that way
>there is no possibilty that nobody can say that we dont follow the
>ICANN Bylaws...got it ? and, at the same time, we guarantee ourselves
>that we will get ONE of the FEW pre-choosen candidates that we
>will choose in a democratic, open and transparent way.

Good point. Since my original motion, although seconded some time ago, has
not yet been put to the vote, I hereby withdraw it in favour of the
following:

I hereby move:

"That the two people who received the greatest support from the DNSO GA
during the GA board membership nominations be put forward to the NC as the
two nominees chosen by the GA for the GA chair position."

I remain,


Andrew P. Gardner
Support the Cyberspace Association, the constituency of Individual Domain
Name Owners http://www.idno.org