[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)

To: <ga@dnso.org>, "Andy Gardner" <andy@navigator.co.nz>
Subject: Re: New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:45:34 -0800
References: <v03130301b4562c08c7ab@[148.233.28.81]>
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org

> "That the two people who received the greatest support from the DNSO GA
> during the GA board membership nominations be put forward to the NC as the
> two nominees chosen by the GA for the GA chair position."

While I'm happy to second this and have it considered, I still think the
"select one candidate and present it to the NC" is a very good option,
and would like to see it considered as well.

Christopher

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)
  - From: <idno@tallship.net>

References:
- New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)
  - From: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>

Prev by Date: New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)
Next by Date: Re: [ga] nomination procedures
Prev by thread: New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)
Next by thread: Re: New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread