[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] New to the List
At 17:18 10.12.99 -0500, Randy Canis wrote:
>Hi,
>I am new to this list. So far, the only e-mail I have received is
>bickering among people I have never met.
An unfortunate side effect of having an ideal of openness without a
balancing enforcement of civility and honesty, I'm afraid.
> Can you tell me what we discuss on the list related to DNSO? Is anyone
> else concerned about the new implementation of the Uniform Domain Dispute
> Policy that is
> 1) No Longer Free,
There was never a free domain resolution policy, unless you call the NSI
"we'll suspend someone else's domain name for you if you have the
trademark" policy *resolution*.
> 2) Like an Adjudicatory Procedure,
You mean - it actually makes a decision? That's supposed to be a feature.
> 3) Has no precedent or guidance for people filing for a dispute through
> WIPO?
well - nothing new has exact precedents.
The institution of "court-like entities" for dispute resolution has long
traditions; see for instance the "appeals" procedure of the IETF standards
process, or the ways the sports organizations deal with doping cases.
I guess the guidance will come after a while.
Harald
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no