RE: [ga] Registration process suggestion

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Actually, I disagree, The DNSO.ORG CA is only certifying that the certifacte
indicates that they are a voter in the DNSO process. Nothing more. Clear
statements limiting liability can and should be issued with the cert. This
is standard practice. Classes of cert are well understood within the CA
comnmunity.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Michael
> Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 12:00 PM
> To: William X. Walsh
> Cc: Roeland M.J. Meyer; ga@dnso.org; Harald Alvestrand; Roberto Gaetano
> Subject: Re: [ga] Registration process suggestion
>
>
> I understand that - but people will use and rely on the certs anyway. The
> law is depressingly unclear as to who is responsible if something goes
> wrong.
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
> >
> > The DNSO CA would only be certifying people in the context of the DNSO
> > processes.
> >
> > - --
>
> --
>
> A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
> U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> +1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
>                         -->It's warm here.<--
>