Re: [ga] Registration process suggestion

[Dan Steinberg <dstein@travel-net.com>]

Given that we have not yet defined the limits of the DNSO process, the
fact that the certification is limited to DNSO probably does not
significantly reduce the risks and potential liability issues Michael
raised.

"William X. Walsh" wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 04-Feb-2000 Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> > 2) liability exposure.  Putting in a zero cent reliance limit will help,
> > but to be worried about how the recipient might use the cert. for
> > non-ICANN related stuff, and the possible consequences for the CA, have a
> > look at "The essential role of trusted third parties in electronic
> > commerce," http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/trusted.htm which
> > sets out some problems one might encounter in the absence of legislation.
> 
> The DNSO CA would only be certifying people in the context of the DNSO
> processes.
> 
> - --
> William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
> DSo Networks  http://dso.net/
> Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
> GPG/PGP Key at http://dso.net/wwalsh.gpg
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: DSo Networks
> 
> iD8DBQE4my9i8zLmV94Pz+IRAlXMAKDaLYCt8JYs0QjnFufs9KSYuKig+ACeI5Fl
> hj5tCFzFOiE3pa3TWWP8NTM=
> =VJC+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin
Box 532, RR1		phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec		fax:   (819) 827-4398
J0X 1N0			e-mail:dstein@travel-net.com