Re: [ga] Re: [ga-full] Individuals

[Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>]

At 10:24 AM 5/27/00 -0400, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
>On Sat, 27 May 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > Should there be a difference in Individual Domain Name Holders and plain
> >  Users of the Net?
>
>Their interests are similar but not identical.  I'd like to hear more on
>this subject.

In what way do their interests differ?


> > What is the relationship possible between the Individuals active in the
> > DNSO and the ICANN AtLarge Membership?
> >
>
>Individuals probably require their own constituency in the DNSO.   Perhaps
>one for each region? ;>

This statement suggests goes down the path that leads to claiming that 
there is a constituency for every label, category or type that can be 
imagined.  While the academic exercise of looking for discernible labels 
might be interesting, it is not a useful way to find and create meaningful 
constituency categories.  The practise should be to first understand what 
differences motivate a category.


> > Should this issue be discussed further, and brought to Yokohama (or
> > anyhow to ICANN's attention)?
>
>It's clear that ICANN will not act on what it doesn't want to see.  The

So now you profess to know the nature and practise of the combines psyches 
of ICANN board members?  That's going just a bit far, don't you think?


>IDNO proposal, for all its faults, never got formally considered.  David

There was nothing to consider.  It was a group entirely without relevant 
content.

d/

=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html