Re: [ga] Re: [ga-full] Individuals

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 07:40 27/05/00 -0700, you wrote:

>
>>IDNO proposal, for all its faults, never got formally considered.  
>
>There was nothing to consider.  

The GA, assembled in Santiago, thought otherwise.

>It was a group entirely without relevant 
>content.
>
It was not the "group" asking for representation for Individual Domain name
owners that was relevant, but the principle that a significant body of
stakeholders should be denied representation on the Names Council.
To state that this was not worthy of consideration is the height of arrogance.
So was the deafening silence of the then ICANN Board.


--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org  

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html