[ga] the IDNO [was: Extension of the Interim Board Directors]

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 14:14 7/11/00 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>Hello Joop,
>
>Tuesday, November 07, 2000, 1:11:37 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>> Yes. This is the way to go about it. There is overlap with the DNSO review
>> topic, but an existing constituency that has been  petitioning for
>> recognition for 18 months, that has a Charter, membership criteria  and
>> elected representatives should be a key factor in that review.
>> The Reviewers should be fully aware of all the facts pertaining to it.
>
>Including the fact that there are numerous flaws in its charter and
>its administration.
>
I'm sure there is room for further improvement. 
In fact the ICANN Board may come with its own demands.

But it has been a serious effort by an elected charter committee.
The site to check it out is www.idno.org/organiz.htm
The ML to criticize it is idno-discuss.



--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association and 
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
Elected representative.
http://www.idno.org  

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html