Re: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors

[FRupp@aol.com]

well kent,

That's what, only two now? against.
Looks like a concessus ("for" recommendation) to me.
If you go by the postings to this list.

As far as the recommendations being unproductive, that 
seems to be only because it conflicts with "your own views" on; 

[What, (decisions or Policies of ICANN or DNSO should or should not
and what maybe, ) "Will be" controlled, by the membership and a 
democratic process.
Time will tell.
For the record, I am for the recommendations.

Forrester 

In a message dated 11/9/00 1:08:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
dhc2@dcrocker.net writes:


> 
> At 11:45 AM 11/7/00 -0500, Sandy Harris wrote:
> >When the issue does come up, I'd like to ensure that the above two points
> >are mentioned as consensus recommendations from the DNSO GA.
> 
> 
> I am opposed to both recommendations.  they are thoroughly unproductive.
> 
> d/
> 
> 
> =-=-=-=-=
> Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
> Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
> 
> 

Forrester D Rupp
frupp@aol.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html