<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to c hange seating rule)
Are you saying that the GA had any voice in any NC member?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 3:48 PM
> To: 'Roeland Meyer'; 'Kent Crispin'; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General
> Assembly call to
> c hange seating rule)
>
>
> Roeland,
>
> As Kent already pointed out, NC members are elected by the
> constituencies.
> They are definitely not appointed by the board.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roeland Meyer [mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 12:53 PM
> To: 'Kent Crispin'; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General
> Assembly call to
> c hange seating rule)
>
>
> 1) We don't elect NC members, that much is obvious. We tried
> and we failed.
> The ICANN BoD appointed whomever they want, regardless of the
> wishes of the
> GA. That record is clear.
>
> 2) There is no impeachement mechanism that works. If there
> is, show it to
> me.
>
> 3) The NC is an appointed body, not an elected one. The ICANN
> BoD is the
> sole appointer. GA NC elections are meaningless.
>
> Kent, you knew all of the above when you posted. You lie.
> However, this is
> the most egregious lie that I have ever seen you make. You
> are usually not
> this obvious. Are you feeling well? Or, perhaps you are
> feeling too well.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 9:20 AM
> > To: ga@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General
> > Assembly call to
> > change seating rule)
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:51:13PM +0800, YJ Park wrote:
> > >
> > > Who is going to paly a check and balance role for NC?
> >
> > The checks and balances on the NC are the standard checks and
> > balances on
> > *any* elected body -- if you don't like what your
> representatives do,
> > you don't re-elect them, or, in the worst case, you impeach them.
> > That's perfectly normal; there isn't any particular mystery
> about the
> > NC in this regard.
> >
> > --
> > Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
> > kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|