<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] UDRP review
I was under the distinct impression that due to litigation it was decided that any self
critiqueing of the UDRP would create liability and therefore it was cancelled.
That was just an impression of a Hearsay article I can't even identify.
Sincerely,
Sotiropoulos wrote:
> 1/31/01 10:14:35 PM, marc@venster.nl wrote:
>
> >Am I mistaken remembering that a review of the UDRP was due somewhat
> >_now_?
>
> Well, I think now would be a great time! BTW, I will shortly be posting my findings on
> the UDRP "procedure" from the poll etitled: "Domain Name Definition Poll" I conducted
> on the WG-Review. I'm sure many will find the results interesting.
>
> Amiably,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> Hermes Network, Inc.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|