Re: [ga] UDRP review

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

>I was under the distinct impression that due to litigation it was decided
>that any self
>critiqueing of the UDRP would create liability and therefore it was cancelled.
>That was just an impression of a Hearsay article I can't even identify.

So how on earth can we get it changed, then?

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html