Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 2:50 pm -0800 2/7/01, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 07:42:10PM +1100, Dassa wrote:
>> It appears to me that a lot of the structures associated with the DNS,
>> ICANN debates and structure are being purposely directed towards
>> ineffectiveness and self destruction.
>
>A standard conspiracy theory.

A standard response from one of the architects of a fraudulent process,
when people start becoming aware of the truth.

>>  IMHO, it is starting to look like
>> the only effective means to become involved is to work outside of the
>> ICANN structures in lobby groups that may develop some serious political
>> clout.
>
>If you are seeking political clout, that is indeed an appropriate
>mechanism.  If your goal is political clout, please leave immediately.

Are you trying to say there is no politics within the ICANN process?

Tee hee. The one thing ICANN has proved to be best at is advancing
political careers - Dyson, Roberts, Crispy-Crockett, Simms, Abril, Stubbs,
Cerf...

The list is long and indistinguished.

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html