RE: [ga] Reform in the GA?

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|>-----Original Message-----
|>From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org 
|>On Behalf Of Kent Crispin
|>Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9:50 AM
|>To: ga@dnso.org
|>Subject: Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?
|>
|>
|>On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 07:42:10PM +1100, Dassa wrote:
|>> It appears to me that a lot of the structures associated with the DNS,
|>> ICANN debates and structure are being purposely directed towards
|>> ineffectiveness and self destruction.
|>
|>A standard conspiracy theory.  

Nope, just an observation.  I can't see how any of the structures were instigated without the people doing it being aware of the limiting factors they were building in.

|>>  IMHO, it is starting to look like
|>> the only effective means to become involved is to work outside of the
|>> ICANN structures in lobby groups that may develop some serious political
|>> clout. 
|>
|>If you are seeking political clout, that is indeed an appropriate
|>mechanism.  If your goal is political clout, please leave immediately.

Being purposely obtuse is not helpful.  The collective goal is to actually have respresentative organizations that are effective in assisting with the future direction of DNS policy.  It is a fact of life that political clout is an effective tool in gaining recognition and achieving objectives.  The current system seems designed to keep the participating recognised organizations small and unrepresentative, without real input.  

I also fail to see why it would be necessary to leave.  There are a lot of political animals included in this forum already.  The whole structure is basically political in nature.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html