<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:12:20PM -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am writing as a member of this GA, and as a member of an
> organization whose leader is now claiming that one thing that
> organization has accomplished is a "turning of the GA of the DNSO
> around."
I remember a day not long past when Joe Baptista was making up obscene
limricks and posting them to the list. Relative to that, the GA has
indeed been "turned around".
> I find it odd that anyone who is a member of this assembly can think
> that this assembly has been turned around in a positive fashion, when
> in fact this GA assembly has not been able to accomplish anything as a
> cohesive body.
That is not its function. It was explicitly never intended to be a
decision making body. There are some who think that is what it should
be, but that is not what it is.
> It can't even initiate elections to replace a GA Chair
> whose office long ago expired. It has been unable to even agree on a
> set of principles to put forward for giving itself a real role in the
> organization.
It has a role; it's just not the role you want it to have.
> So I'd like to know what the other GA members think.
>
> Has there been a "turning of the GA" around?
>
> I have to say that the credibility of the person who made this claim
> took a nose dive when he claimed that the IDNO was responsible for
> this so called "turning" around that doesn't appear to have ever
> occurred.
How quickly we forget...
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|