<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] [Admin] Complaint against William Walsh - comments desired
Jeff Williams has made formal complaint against William Walsh for abusive
posting against Joop Ternstra.
The posting complained about was this one:
> >Hello Joop,
> >
> >Wednesday, February 07, 2001, 3:46:11 AM, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >
> > > At 23:53 6/02/01 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
> >
> > >>
> > >>I doubt Joop Teernstra (who opposed the rules that eliminated the
> > >>Baptista problem) was taking credit for that.
> > >>
> >
> > > Mr Walsh in his zeal for carrying his vendetta anew to this list, has
> >some
> > > problem with the truth here.
> > > I never opposed the list rules. I suggested an improvement.
> >
> >Yes, and when those improvements were not supported, you opposed the
> >adoption of the rules in favor the extremist rules that you pushed
> >into the IDNO, and supported the actions of those who left the GA in
> >protest over what was simply rules of simply civil discourse (which
> >have been effective in solving the problems that were facing the GA at
> >that time).
> >
The list monitor wishes to hear comments on whether this posting should be
considered abusive or not before making a decision.
In the interest of getting input on this subject without taking up the
GA list's time on this issue, I ask respondents:
PLEASE SEND YOUR INPUT TO GA-ABUSE@DNSO.ORG, AND NOT TO THE MAIN LIST!
(Of course, there is no block against discussing this issue on the main
list also. But there are a number of people who are tired of the issue
already. I will summarize the input to the main list when announcing a
decision.)
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|