Re: Spinoff important? (Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions)

["JandL" <jandl@jandl.com>]

> Jeff, as opposed to each other I agree, but the fair treatment of all
> really should be the objective. Sincerely,
> 
> > Another interpretation is that the *threat* of being forced to spin
> > off the registrar allowed competition for registrar services to
> > happen. If this interpretation is correct, the threat has to remain
> > active somehow in order to ensure fair treatment of all registrars.
> 
>   Seems to me that what is important is the fair treatment of the
>   REGISTRANTS,
> not the registrars.  This is something that the ICANN BoD needs to
> concentrate on rather than the Registrar side of the equation.

Precisely!  If not for the users and registrants, registrars would 
have no reason to exist.  Further, if ICANN insists that others do 
not exist because they are not within their own framework, they are 
hurting both users and registrants.  I'm relieved to see someone 
recognizes who the important parties are.  It is NOT the registrars 
OR the registries OR the IP interests.  It is the USERS.

> 
> >
> >
> >
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html