Re: Spinoff important? (Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions)

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Eric and all remaining assembly members,

  The ICANN BoD has thus far been playing the political game of
the Registrant vs the Registrar as well as playing off one set of preferred
registrars against NSI/Verisign.  As such, the emphasis it seems to me would
be to be with the Registrant.  That doesn't seem to be the direction that
this ICANN BoD is heading or preferring.  We [INEGroup] as well
as a number of other groups, find this to be wholly inadequate as well
as inconsistent with the White Paper and the MoU.

edierker@hi-tek.com wrote:

> Jeff, as opposed to each other I agree, but the fair treatment of all really should
> be the objective.
> Sincerely,
>
> > Another interpretation is that the *threat* of being forced to spin off the
> > registrar allowed competition for registrar services to happen.
> > If this interpretation is correct, the threat has to remain active somehow
> > in order to ensure fair treatment of all registrars.
>
>   Seems to me that what is important is the fair treatment of the REGISTRANTS,
> not the registrars.  This is something that the ICANN BoD needs to concentrate
> on rather than the Registrar side of the equation.
>
> >
> >
> >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html