<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions
- To: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions
- From: vint cerf <vcerf@MCI.NET>
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 23:40:51 -0500
- Cc: svl@nrw.net, apisan@servidor.unam.mx, Amadeu@nominalia.com, karl@CaveBear.com, jcohen@shapirocohen.com, phil.davidson@bt.com, f.fitzsimmons@att.net, ken.fockler@sympatico.ca, mkatoh@wdc.fujitsu.com, mkatoh@wdc.fujitsu.com, hans@icann.org, shkyong@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr, andy@ccc.de, junsec@wide.ad.jp, quaynor@ghana.com, roberts@icann.org, helmut.schink@icn.siemens.de, linda@icann.org, ga@dnso.org, ecdiscuss@ec-pop.org, core@corenic.org
- In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103110507150.17525-100000@pan.bijt.net>
- References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010308130157.05091560@shoe.reston.mci.net>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
DNSO was indeed consulted as to the policy for the creation of new
TLDs and gave advice which the board accepted to select a modest number
of TLDs to start this process. The actual selection of a particular TLD
or party to operate its registry is not a policy matter, it is something
that ICANN does - within the policy guidance of the board.
At 05:13 AM 3/11/2001 +0100, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>Ultimately the point was that the DNSO was not consulted about the
>selection of new TLDs.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|