RE: [ga] Re: Board descisions

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

As has been made abundently clear many times already, VeriSign is fully
prepared to proceed with the terms of the existing agreement and are ready
to do so.  Option B just presents another choice that wasn't there before.
The fact that there is little time left would be a weak reason to reject
Option B if indeed it was better for ICANN and the Internet community.  It
really shouldn't be that hard in the next two plus weeks to careful evaluate
the merits of B.

Chuck Gomes

-----Original Message-----
From: Kendall Dawson [mailto:kendall@obs-us.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:29 AM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Board descisions


At 06:15 AM 3/14/2001 -0600, Andy Gardner wrote:

>3. ICANN's answer should be "you waited too long, so the original contract
>stands".
>
>End of story.


I have to say that I agree with Andy and support "option A" - let the 
original contract stand.
What is best for VeriSign's shareholders is not necessarily best for the 
Internet as a whole.

Kendall


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html