<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:13:51 -0500, you wrote:
>It is my understanding that the reason for a late start in the negotiations
>of a new agreement had to do with the fact that there did not seem to be any
>realistic chance of accomplishing such a task. There was not to my
>knowledge any intential effort to delay the process. In fact, delaying it
>had very negative consequences for us in the investment community. The
>sooner there is clarity in this regard the better for us.
>
>Keep in mind, we were pursuing a path of complying with the existing
>agreement and were very close to finalizing tasks related to that.
Chuck - can you (or someone who knows) clarify whether Verisign
approached ICANN with a proposal to change the existing contract, or
ICANN staff approached Verisign and when this contact first happened?
DPF
--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|