Re: [ga] Re: Board decisions

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Patrick I come back on this. When I read it it upsets me.

On 12:31 15/03/01, Patrick Corliss said:
> > In Melbourne, Joe Sims advised that Verisign was working on the divestiture
> > according to Plan A when they (Verisign) presented another option to ICANN
> > stafff for consideration.  ICANN staff rejected that particular 
> proposal but
> > this opened the door to discussions.

You/we found that sentence a good explanation. But when you conisder it it 
is a shame. Joe Sims (an external consultant) advised you (an @large 
Member,  a stakeholder and a ccTLD Director, Member of the DNSO, Member of 
the WG-Review) that VeriSign presented ICANN (ie BoD, DNSO) a new plan that 
you/we should have considered (but you/we don't even know what was proposed 
yet). Then he tells you/us that he refused it on your/our behalf and 
started new discussions, of which we learn the real nature through a 
semi-public letter from the other party.

Would this happen in my company, I would fire the guy. Would you not in yours?

Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html