<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: $200 million (was [ga] Draft Resolution)
At 15:17 21/03/2001 -0500, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>Let me first of all reiterate what I just said in a response to Michael
>Froomkin: : "Under the existing agreement, there is a commitment for $0.
>Under the new agreements, there is a commitment for $200M."
one thing that is unclear in my mind is who would control the allocation of
the USD 200M.
We tried this once before (the "domain name tax" that was struck down in
the early days of paying for DNS names). I've got projects I could think of
offhand that would eat around 20M, and I think they would benefit the
Internet - but why should anyone believe my judgment?
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|