<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Quorum (Re: [ga] CORRECTION!!!)
At 19:27 25/03/2001 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>The salient point here is that THERE IS A QUORUM RULE. There is a clear
>definition of exactly how many people are participating, how they got
>there, and exactly how many of them it takes pass something.
>
>That is not the case here.
At the moment, the GA Assembly has 291 voting members
(http://www.dnso.org/secretariat/rosterindex.html).
For a resolution, an absolute majority of the members who bother to vote at
all must support the resolution (no minimum quorum).
For a rule change, a quorum of at least 20% or 100 voters (the smaller of
the two) is required, and the vote must have at least 2/3 majority.
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-voting-rules.html
We have rules.
(I also think that we have rough consensus on the contract issue, as
Roberto reported. Even if we haven't voted on it yet).
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|