RE: [ga] Re: Last minute changes to Verisign agreements

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Here's my problem with this: I can't envison how to get evaluation, with
non disclosure, from a list. I'd like to get sound policy concerns,
articulated, and fact based, from the constitiencies, aand from the GA .. on
all major decisions. 

that means "organizing ourselves" and thinking through the difference
between policy analysis and advice, and trying to consult on board level
decisions.

isn't that why we elected them to be board members?

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Svensson [mailto:paul-dns@svensson.org]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 8:52 AM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: [ga] Re: Last minute changes to Verisign agreements


On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Dave Crocker wrote:

>At 10:23 PM 4/1/2001, DPF wrote:
>>The changes to the agreement are welcome but it would be a terrible
>>public policy example to agree to such changes with less than 24 hours
>>to consider and analyse them.
>
>Given that the changes are directly in line with the public requests, what 
>is the purpose of additional delay?

Dave,
The issue isn't if option C is an improvement on option B (which it
apparently seems to be), but whether it's an improvement on option A.
Which means, that even if it's obvious that it's a step in the right
direction, it may take more than 24 hours to analyze wether it goes
far enough.

	/Paul

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html