RE: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

> From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 5:42 PM
> 
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 05:40:23PM -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:
> [...]
> > > This is a fact.  Moreover, officers and directors of a corporation
> > > always have a fiduciary duty to the corporation, a duty 
> that is defined
> > > in laws concerning corporations.
> > >
> > 
> > Said laws also clearly mandate a membership, in that we are 
> talking non-profit
> > here. 
> 
> Sorry, that is simply incorrect.  Said laws do not mandate a 
> membership.  It is perfectly legal to have a corporation without 
> members.

Not for a California non-profit.

> > So there is a legal moral and ethical duty to have members and then
> > excercise that fiduciary duty to them.
> 
> Nope.  

Given the above ... incorrect.

> > > In fact, the GA is not dominated by technocrats, bureaucrats,
> > > businessmen, lawyers, or lobbyists.
> > 
> > This I do not know to be a fact.
> 
> Which of the above classes do you belong to?

01Apr01 was yesterday ...
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html