Re: Re[2]: [ga] Re: iCANN's protection

[Bruce James <bmj@keyname.net>]

Shoot.....Just when I get IPv4 down and IPv6 running someone comes out with
another thing I *just* have to learn....:)    IPv8 is going to have to
wait.....:)
I think I see IPv16 in the horizon...:(

/Bruce


----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "(Kristy McKee)" <k@widgital.com>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 5:56 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Re: iCANN's protection


Hello Kristy,

Monday, April 16, 2001, 12:51:37 PM, Kristy McKee wrote:
> We haven't
> been all that successful in the IETF in working with the brighter
> individuals and as a result IPv8, and many other advanced technologies are
> being used in development spaces and Internet Root systems that are not
run
> by the USG.

Let's leave Jim Fleming's fantasy IPv8 out of this discussion.

We need to stick to things that had a basis in reality.

--
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html